Political Campaign Funding Essays - , Term Papers

Political Campaign Funding "No matter what your social issue, if you want to solve it get the money out of politics. Only then will lawmakers vote for their people rather than their pocketbooks." Jack E. Lohman. Money corrupts politics, and when contributions are being made to candidates it is not in the best interest of the American people. Campaign Finance is out of control in today's political races. Candidates are taking money from wherever and whoever they can get it. Soft money is flowing through elections without care or caution. People who make these contributions do not share the views of the average citizen, so politicians end up representing the wrong people. Money decides races, sometimes leaving the better man but lighter spender out of a position. Candidates make decisions based on what will help them financially that what is better for the people. Contributions by industry are made not in the interest of the people, sometimes hurting them in ways they don't even know. No matter what the opposition may say campaign finance reform is needed urgently to keep our democracy as our founders intended it. People and corporations that make the largest donations to campaigns do not share views with the general population. Politicians will listen to those who give them money so that they can depend on that money being there again when it is time for reelection. Yet individual donors making a $200 dollar or more contribution make up only .33% of the population. This extremely small percentage of mostly wealthy individuals gain the power to influence politicians to their liking. The idea that these people should have power to affect government more than those with less money goes against the concept of equality for all, which is what made this country great. People who make large donations do not share the same views on most issues as the general population. Robert L. Borosage and Ruy Teixeira report that while 53 percent of voters want stricter regulations on businesses and corporations, to give workers a fair salary and working conditions, 58 percent of campaign donors want to see less control over the businesses and corporations of America. Donors also want less government spending with lower taxes, while the majority of citizens want a larger, more powerful government. A very tiny part of our population is giving money to campaigns telling candidates what they have to do to continue getting campaign contributions, yet these people do not represent the ideology and sentiment of the people as a whole. There must be a change in the way that campaigns are financed if democracy is to survive. If we do not reform campaign finance we will have politicians working only for those who can afford to contribute. Money is the major factor in any political race. It can sway a decision very strongly depending on how well it is used. In the House, the candidate who spends the most money on his or her campaign wins 92% of the time. Things are no different in the Senate, here 88% of the time the bigger spender wins. Incumbents are usually the tip money spender, because they raise more money. Paul Starr, writer for The American Prospect , estimates that it would take $1,000,000 for a challenger to defeat the incumbent. The only way a challenger could get this kind of money would be to appeal to big business and the wealthy, who have radically different ideas about government than the general public. A challenger, to even have a chance, would have to turn to business and wealth to win. With this great difficulty to de-seat an incumbent, turnover in congress drops, and members become stagnant, winning on name alone. All the while, they are giving breaks to the corporations and wealthy people who got them there. With campaigns finance reform, we could get challengers and incumbents on a level playing field so that the candidate with the better ideas who will honestly help the majority will end up the victor. It would not matter much where candidates got the money from for their campaigns except that when elected, politicians act on in accordance to the wishes of those who have made donations. 71% of citizens say that a politicians choices and votes are made on the basis of money. 61% of donors agree with this. Its been explained that a small percentage of people make donations, and these people do not represent the population as a whole. If politicians make decisions based on this small group of people they

Personal Growth Essay - How You Can Write a Harvard Essay

Personal Growth Essay - How You Can Write a Harvard EssayThere are many examples of personal growth essays out there, but what makes a Harvard personal growth essay so great? It seems like every writer out there has some variation of the same basic structure. However, one of the things that really sets this essay apart is the success and focus on the topic by the author.A personal growth essay is designed to help you get to the core of what is truly important to you in life. Most of the examples I've seen come across as being written by a college student who is just beginning to figure things out, but in my opinion that's where it starts. What separates an average college student from a professional writer like yourself is the awareness of how to get to the heart of your own questions and of what really matters to you. From there, you will be able to begin writing a story and telling the readers how you're going to solve their problems for them.Another thing that makes a personal gro wth essay excellent is the level of seriousness with which the author gets into the details of the problem. That's because there is nothing more difficult to write about than yourself, and if you want people to listen to your story, you must at least feel like you care about the person you're talking about.A Harvard personal growth essay comes across as more genuine than most other examples, because the writer is writing about a personal problem. This might seem obvious, but too many writers lack the ability to sit down and look themselves in the mirror and realize how important they are to themselves.While the other examples I've read don't give the reader any sense of who you are, a Harvard essay gives you a chance to have your voice heard. For example, if you are struggling with feeling loved and not wanted, you can come across as a desperate person with no place to turn. However, if you write about your struggle and begin to describe how you feel that you are being shunned, that 's a much different story.Personal growth essays written by people who actually understand their issues tend to be easier to read because the writer is not under the impression that he or she needs to present an entire lecture. Most people will find that they don't enjoy spending thirty minutes explaining a point in a way that doesn't really seem to relate to the problem at hand.Using a Harvard personal growth essay as a guide will ensure that you get to the heart of your own problems. So, if you're looking for a solid personal growth essay, check out Harvard's website.